Tag: trump

Argumentum Ergo Decedo, Like it or Leave

Denotes responding to the criticism of a critic by implying that the critic is motivated by undisclosed favorability or affiliation to an out-group, rather than responding to the criticism itself. The fallacy implicitly alleges that the critic does not appreciate the values and customs of the criticized group or is traitorous, and thus suggests that the critic should avoid the question or topic entirely, typically by leaving the criticized group.


The Fallacy

President Trump’s Tweet suggested that elected government officials, who came to the United States from other countries, who disagree with United States policy, should go back to their home countries and attempt to fix them before being critical of America.

This is demonstrative of the fallacy: argumentum ergo decedo. Which loosely translates to “then go off,” or “then leave.” That if one has criticism of the country, they should leave.

It is a fallacy, because rather than responding to the specific criticism, it directs the critic to leave, if they don’t like it.

A Strategic Error

At the time of writing this article, July 14th, 2019, AOC and Nancy Pelosi were at odds, with AOC implying, perhaps accusing, Pelosi of racism for criticizing her. The reasoning being: that Pelosi is white and AOC is Hispanic; a terrible argument. Meanwhile Trumps approval rating soared to the highest it has ever been, approximately 47%.

A contributing factor was that the media was largely focused on the Democrats, putting them at a strategic disadvantage comparatively to the Republicans, months before the 2020 presidential election.

The damage: now the spotlight is back on the Republicans instead of the Democrats. The quarrel within the Democratic party was an opportunity for Republicans to silently await for Democratic support to erode. This opportunity has evaporated with the President’s tweet.

Allegation of Racism

Finally we come to the issue of racism. The question: are the statements of the president racist?

Although unstated, it can be assumed that the statements were directed at Rep. Ilhan Omar, a refugee from Somalia, elected to Minnesota’s 5th district.

The president’s statement is being interpreted as “go back to where you came from,” which can certainly be taken as a racist, xenophobic statement.

To be more accurate, the presidents statement is actually closer to this: “Before you criticize America, fix your home country.” The “go back” part of the statement, was a colossal error.

But is it racist?

Test it with other groups of people. If a German living in Kansas was critical of the United States, the statement would apply to them. If a Chinese person living in California was critical of the United States, the statement would also apply to them.

The statement applies to country of origin, and not race. The countries that it applies to are all countries that are not the United States. The affected races of people, are all races of people. Therefore race is not specified, therefore the statement cannot be racist.

It is being touted as a racist statement due to political expediency, not because of an accurate and truthfully motivated analysis.

The president’s statement is fallacious, but not racist.

Reductio ad Hitlerum

Playing the Nazi card, is an attempt to invalidate someone else’s position on the basis that the same view was held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party, for example: “Hitler was against tobacco smoking, X is against tobacco smoking, therefore X is a Nazi”.

Two similiar looking pictures: a fence, people held in detention on one side, political officials on the other.

The creator of the picture even matched the colors to make them more similiar.

This is an example of the Reduction to Hitler fallacy. Upon analysis, it is absurd. The difference between immigration detention in the United States, and concentration camps in Nazi Germany during World War II are incomparable.

Attempts to draw parallels between the two are politically motivated, evidenced by the complete lack of outrage at the exact situation under the Obama administration. It is an attempt to manipulate the emotional state of the public to lessen the support for the current administration, and is exploitative of all who suffered under the Nazis during World War II.


Is Tim Pool Right Wing?

Recently Tim Pool, a political commentator and YouTuber was labeled “Right-Wing” by the media after accepting an invitation to a social media summit at the White House.

Interestingly, Tim Pool’s political views are mostly left-leaning, so why did he get stuck, with a right wing label?

Pool is not a follower, or NPC if you will. He speaks what he thinks, truthfully and in good faith, I believe. In the mid 90’s he would have been a good Democrat, however, in 2019, the core values of the Democratic party are zealously protected. It has almost become analogous to the Catholic church in the 1500’s. ‘You have a new idea? Well you must be an enemy of the party’.

There is an odd sense of a pressure to conform in the modern Democratic party. This becomes challenging when the party’s platform changes from underneath you.

In just a few short years Socialism has crept from the fringes into the mainstream. Up until Trumps election, Democrats were against illegal immigration, but now the idea of open borders is being pushed as a mainline idea. Transgender women are dominating women’s sports, and being celebrated. The list goes on.

Tim Pool, for his crime of daring to question the state of American politics, is castigated as right wing. The media did not do this because they think it is true. They did it to attempt to invalidate his position before his words were heard by an audience.